Chamber of Advocates Raises Concerns Over Chief Justice Appointment Process

The Chamber of Advocates has expressed concern over the ongoing process to appoint a new Chief Justice, describing recent developments as damaging to the credibility of Malta’s highest institutions. The organisation noted that what should have been a discreet and structured procedure has increasingly taken on the character of a public spectacle.

The Chamber highlighted that the Constitution requires a two-thirds parliamentary majority for such appointments to ensure national consensus rather than political manoeuvring. It pointed out that the failure of political parties to reach agreement, coupled with speculation and the circulation of potential candidates’ names, indicates a lack of leadership and responsibility at the national level.

According to the Chamber, the public discussion of prospective candidates undermines the spirit of the appointment process and exposes individuals to undue pressure and criticism. It stressed that the process should have been confidential, conducted with dignity, and carried out with full respect for the judiciary. The credibility and authority of the courts, the Chamber argued, should not be subject to political calculations or public debate.

The organisation urged political leaders to act with constitutional maturity and to reach agreement promptly, warning that continued delays are eroding public confidence in Malta’s institutions and causing harm to the justice sector. The Chamber emphasised that appointing a Chief Justice is a matter of national responsibility and should not be treated as a political contest.

The Chamber concluded that resolving the appointment in a timely and respectful manner is essential to maintaining the integrity of the judiciary and public trust in the justice system.

#MaltaDaily