The recent installation of warning signs for hidden speed guns in certain areas has reignited debates about the ethics of traffic enforcement.

Dr. Jean Karl Soler’s endorsement of this move raises fundamental questions about fairness and accountability on the road.

While the introduction of warning signs addresses concerns about transparency, Dr. Soler highlights a crucial distinction: the legitimacy of fines issued by non-police personnel operating these cameras.

MaltaDaily is informed that some drivers receiving fines from hidden speed cameras, are contesting them “to ensure justice is served.” However, the installation of these signs will probably put a stop to this.

Residents who spoke to MaltaDaily have claimed that they are happy to see such signs put up in their street as they “should stop or deter drivers passing by from over speeding.”

Moreover, the debate over hidden speed guns intersects with broader discussions about surveillance and privacy rights.

It also worth noting that the speed limit in these residential areas is standard across the country, even where there are no signs of speed limit. It seems however, that if a speed gun may be present in a certain area, the speed gun sign will be shown to inform drivers – something similar to when a speed camera is coming up.

As technology evolves, it is essential for policymakers to balance road safety with respect for civil liberties. However, road safety remains a top priority.

#MaltaDaily